Radiation Physics and Engineering

A peer-reviewed journal published by K. N. Toosi University of Technology

Current Issue

By Issue

By Author

By Subject

Author Index

Keyword Index

About Journal

Aims and Scope

Editorial Board

Publication Ethics

Indexing and Abstracting

Related Links

FAQ

Peer Review Process

News

Journal Metrics

Instructions for Authors

Manuscript Preparation

Journal Forms

RPE Reference Format

Analysis of the control rod withdrawal speed impact on the transient behavior of Bushehr-1 NPP using Simulink software

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

1 Department of Nuclear Engineering‎, ‎Science and Research Branch‎, ‎Islamic Azad University‎, ‎Tehran‎, ‎Iran

2 Reactor and Nuclear Safety Research School‎, ‎Nuclear Science and Technology Research Institute (NSTRI)‎, ‎Tehran‎, ‎Iran

Abstract

In this research, the governing dynamic equations of the Bushehr NPP core are studied and modeled using Matlab (Simulink) software. The point kinetic equation with the temperature feedbacks and the fuel-coolant energy balance equations in the time domain were used for this purpose. The model is validated against the rod drop accident data available in BNPP-1 FSAR, and they agreed. Then, this time-domain model is used to find the maximum movement speed of the control rods. For this goal, linear and non-linear rod movement equations have been modeled. In this regard, the maximum withdrawal speed of the working bank (H10) with a worth of 1.1 dollars has been investigated. Using the linear CR model, a speed limit of 9 cm.s-1 has been obtained to prevent the initiation of a reactor trip. The maximum speed using the non-linear model of the CR was found out to be dependent on its initial position. Thus, in three positions of the H10 bank: 100%, 80%, and 50% of the length inside the reactor, the maximum withdrawal speed values were valuated 11.5, 7.7, and 4.4 cm.s-1 respectively. According to the results, among the reactor parameters including power, period, and fuel temperature, which are monitored by the reactor protection system to initiate the reactor trip, the reactor power is the limiting factor for specifying the maximum withdrawal speed. This study is performed using time domain analysis, and the obtained results are consistent with the results reported in the previous research using Laplace transform approach.

Highlights

  • BNPP core neutronic and thermal-hydraulic equations in the time domain were modeled in Simulink software.
  • The developed model was validated against FSAR data for the rod drop accident.
  • Time domain analysis was performed using the control rod linear and non-linear models.
  • The results were compared with the previous study using the transfer function approach.
  • The maximum allowable control rod withdrawal speed was investigated by simulating several experiments.

Keywords

References
Bell, G. (1970). I and Glasstone S. Nuclear reactor theory.
Boromand, Z., Lashkari, A., Masoudi, S. F., et al. (2021). Numerical and experimental study of control rods effects on neutronic power in TRR. Progress in Nuclear Energy, 136:103742.
Chen, W., Hao, J., Chen, L., et al. (2013). Solution of point reactor neutron kinetics equations with temperature feedback by singularly perturbed method. Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations, 2013.
Duderstadt, J. J. and Hamilton, L. J. (1976). Nuclear reactor analysis. Wiley.
El-Genk, M. S. and Tournier, J.-M. P. (2016). A point kinetics model for dynamic simulations of next generation nuclear reactor. Progress in Nuclear Energy, 92:91-103.
El Tokhy, M. S. and Mahmoud, I. I. (2017). Parameter analysis of neutron point kinetics for nuclear reactors. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 318:256–273.
Fadaei, A. H. and Setayeshi, S. (2009). Control rod worth calculation for VVER-1000 nuclear reactor using WIMS and CITATION codes. Progress in Nuclear Energy, 51(1):184–191.
FSAR (2003). Final Safety Analysis Report of BNPP-1, Reactor, 49.BU.1.0.0.OO.FSAR.RDR001, Revision 0.
Hamieh, S. and Saidinezhad, M. (2012). Analytical solution of the point reactor kinetics equations with temperature feed-back. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 42:148–152.
Henry, A. (1975). Nuclear-Reactor Analysis, Chapter 7.
Hetrick, D. L. and Jarvis, R. (1972). Dynamics of nuclear reactors.
Kerlin, T. W. and Upadhyaya, B. R. (2019). Dynamics and control of nuclear reactors. Academic press.
Khajavi, M. N., Menhaj, M. B., and Suratgar, A. A. (2002). A neural network controller for load following operation of nuclear reactors. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 29(6):751–760.
Khoshahval, F. and Ahdavi, A. A. (2016). Determination of the maximum speed of WWER-1000 nuclear reactor control rods. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 87:58–68.
Khoshahval, F. and Akbari, M. (2020). A new method for the solution of the point kinetics equations in the presence of Newtonian temperature feedback. Progress in Nuclear Energy, 119:103165.
Mustafa, S. S. (2021). The effect of control rods on the reactivity and flux distribution of BWR 4 bundle using MCNPX Code. Scientific Reports, 11(1):8713.
Torabi, M., Lashkari, A., Masoudi, S. F., et al. (2018). Neutronic analysis of control rod effect on safety parameters in Tehran Research Reactor. Nuclear Engineering and Technology, 50(7):1017–1023.
Wang, P., Chen, Z., Zhang, R., et al. (2015). Control simulation and study of load rejection transient for AP1000. Progress in Nuclear Energy, 85:28–43.
Weaver, L. E. (1968). Reactor dynamics and control: state space techniques. American Elsevier Publishing Company.
Radiation Physics and Engineering
Volume 5, Issue 1
January 2024
Pages 63-74
Files
History
  • Receive Date: 07 July 2023
  • Revise Date: 26 August 2023
  • Accept Date: 11 September 2023
Share
How to cite
Statistics