An international journal published by K. N. Toosi University of Technology

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

Reactor and Nuclear Safety Research School‎, ‎Nuclear Science and Technology Research Institute (NSTRI)‎, ‎Tehran‎, ‎Iran

Abstract

Today thorium based fuels are being investigated as an alternative fuel technology. However, the majority of thorium fuel research studies are limited to reactor physics investigations, which leaves a gap for dose evaluation and shielding concerns of such spent fuels. The present work investigates thorium oxide fuel assemblies in Tehran research reactor. The fuel gamma dose rates are calculated at different burnups and cooling times. A comparison between the reactor routine fuel and the thorium oxide fuel is conducted to reveal the thorium-based fuel application shielding challenges. The obtained results showed that inverse to U3O8-Al routine fuel the spent ThO2 gamma dose rates are completely dependent to the burnup values. In addition, for transporting the spent ThO2 fuel with the routine transport casks there is needed to be waited for the higher cooling times than U3O8-Al transportation time or construction of thicker transport casks is needed for transportation of the thorium-based spent fuels at shorter times.

Highlights

  • Thorium-based fuel gamma dose rate dependencies on burn-up values were calculated.
  • The required shield thickness was discussed for transportation of the Thorium-based spent fuel.
  • Gamma dose rate of the thorium-based and uranium-based fuels were compared in cooling times.

Keywords

Croff, A. G. (1980). User’s manual for the ORIGEN2 computer code. Technical report, Oak Ridge National Lab.

Fensin, M. L. (2008). Development of the MCNPX depletion capability: A Monte Carlo linked depletion method that automates the coupling between MCNPX and CINDER90 for high fidelity burnup calculations. University of Florida.

Frybort, J. (2014). Comparison of the radiological hazard of thorium and uranium spent fuels from VVER-1000 reactor. Radiation Physics and Chemistry, 104:408–413.

IAEA-TECDOC (2000). Thorium based fuel options for the generation of electricity: Developments in the 1990s. IAEA TECDOC–1155, page 79.

IAEA-TECDOC (2005). Nuclear fuel cycle. Material Section. Thorium fuel cycle-potential benefits and challenges-IAEATECDOC-1450. Technical report, Technical report, IAEA, International Atomic Energy Agency.

Kang, J. and von Hippel, F. N. (2001). U-232 and the proliferation-resistance of U-233 in spent fuel. Science & Global Security, 9(1):1–32.

Mirvakili, S., Keyvani, M., Arshi, S. S., et al. (2012). Possibility evaluation of eliminating the saturated control fuel element from Tehran research reactor core. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 248:197–205.

Naymushin, A., Chertkov, Y., Lebedev, I., et al. (2016). Use of thorium in thermal-neutron reactors: Computation model and comparison of neutronic codes. Journal of Industrial Pollution Control, 32(2):428–431.

Pelowitz, D. B. et al. (2005). MCNPX user’s manual. Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos.

Srinivasan, P., Ganesan, S., Sharma, D., et al. (2006). Estimation of dose rates on the phwr irradiated thorium oxide bundles based on barc updated nuclear data for origen code.

In National Workshop on Nuclear Data, NWND-2006, Mangalore, India, pages 8–11.

USNRC (1997). Standard review plan for dry cask storage systems, US Nuclear Regulatory Commission and others. NUREG-1536, 1.

Wojtaszek, D., Colton, A., Bromley, B., et al. (2018). A scenario analysis of once-through thorium fuel cycles with pressure tube HWRs in Canada. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 111:152–162.