ACR-SPR (2014). ACR-SPR practice parameter for performing FDG-PET/CT in oncology. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology.
Beyer, T., Czernin, J., and Freudenberg, L. S. (2011). Variations in clinical PET/CT operations: results of an international survey of active PET/CT users. Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 52(2):303–310.
Boellaard, R., O’Doherty, M. J., Weber, W. A., et al. (2010). FDG PET and PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour PET imaging: version 1.0. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 37(1):181.
Delbeke, D., Coleman, R. E., Guiberteau, M. J., et al. (2006). Procedure guideline for tumor imaging with 18F-FDG
PET/CT 1.0. Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 47(5):885–895. Graham, M. M., Badawi, R. D., andWahl, R. L. (2011). Variations in PET/CT methodology for oncologic imaging at US academic medical centers: an imaging response assessment team survey. Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 52(2):311–317.
IAEA (2012). Cyclotron Produced Radionuclides: Operation and Maintenance of Gas and Liquid Targets. Radioisotopes and Radiopharmaceuticals Series No. 4.
IAEA-TECDOC-1310 (2002). Optimization of synthesis and quality control procedures for the preparation of F-18 and
I-123 labelled peptides for nuclear medicine. Jacene, H. A., Leboulleux, S., Baba, S., et al. (2009). Assessment of interobserver reproducibility in quantitative 18FFDG PET and CT measurements of tumor response to therapy. Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 50(11):1760–1769.
Shankar, L. K., Hoffman, J. M., Bacharach, S., et al. (2006). Consensus recommendations for the use of 18F-FDG PET as an indicator of therapeutic response in patients in National Cancer Institute Trials. Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 47(6):1059–1066.
Surasi, D. S., Bhambhvani, P., Baldwin, J. A., et al. (2014). 18F-FDG PET and PET/CT patient preparation: a review of the literature. Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology, 42(1):5–13.