A peer-reviewed journal published by K. N. Toosi University of Technology

Characterization of waste materials and its application towards sustainable radiation protection

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

1 Department of Physics, Patan Multiple Campus, Tribhuvan University, Patandhoka, Lalitpur, Nepal

2 Nepal Academy of Science and Technology, Khumaltar, Lalitpur, Nepal

Abstract
Radiation shielding is essential for minimizing exposure to harmful ionizing radiation by employing materials that effectively absorb or block radiation. This study investigates the shielding potential of five waste-derived materials -human hair, waste glass, plastic, waste cement, and medical gloves- against β and γ radiations emitted from Thallium-204, Cesium-137, Strontium-90, and Cobalt-60 sources. Circular disc samples (2 ± 0.2 mm thick, 20 ± 0.08 mm diameter, 0.8 ± 0.11 g) were prepared in pure and composite forms (0–100 wt%). Shielding properties were quantified using a GM counter and gamma spectrometry, while structural and functional characterizations were performed using X-ray diffraction (XRD) and Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). Results show that waste cement exhibited the highest shielding efficiency with η = 27.61% and AF = 1.38 at 100 wt%, effectively reducing Sr-90 penetration below ~0.90 counts/s. Medical gloves showed moderate but consistent attenuation (η ≈ 24.32%, AF ≈ 1.32), whereas hair and plastic demonstrated weaker performance (η = 10.00–25.59%, AF = 1.12–1.34). Glass exhibited low shielding capacity due to its intrinsic radioactivity (η = 1.58%, AF = 1.02). FTIR and XRD analyses confirmed that inorganic groups such as Si–O, CO₃²⁻, and SO₄²⁻ in cement and glass enhance density and rigidity, improving photon attenuation, while polymeric and organic matrices offer limited protection. Transmission studies using Co-60 validated that none of the low-density materials achieved attenuation beyond 28%. Overall, waste cement demonstrates strong potential for sustainable, low-cost radiation shielding, which can be further enhanced through composite reinforcement with dense waste materials.

Highlights

  • Waste cement showed the highest shielding (η = 27.61%, AF = 1.38), reducing Sr-90 radiation below ∼ 0.90 counts.s−1.
  • Medical gloves provided moderate and stable attenuation (η ≈ 24.32%, AF ≈ 1.32).
  • Human hair and plastic exhibited low and inconsistent shielding (η = 10.00 − 25.59%).
  • Waste glass showed poor shielding (η = 1.58%, AF = 1.02) due to intrinsic radioactivity.
  • It was found inorganic bonds (Si-O, CO2−3, SO2−4) improve photon attenuation, and organic matrices are less effective.

Keywords

Subjects


Copyright
RPE is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0).

Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no potential conflict of interest regarding the publication of this work‎.

Funding
‎The authors declare that no funds‎, ‎grants‎, ‎or other financial support were received during the preparation of this manuscript‎.

AbuAlRoos, N. J., Amin, N. A. B., and Zainon, R. (2019). Conventional and new lead-free radiation shielding materials for radiation protection in nuclear medicine: A review. Radiation Physics and Chemistry, 165:108439.
Akkurt, I., Gunoglu, K., and Arda, S. (2014). Detection efficiency of NaI (Tl) detector in 511–1332 keV energy range. Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations, 2014(1):186798.
An, S.-Y., Lee, M.-J., and Shim, Y.-S. (2022). X-Ray Diffraction Analysis of Various Calcium Silicate-Based Materials. Journal of Dental Hygiene Science, 22(3):191–198.
Chunjaemsri, T., Chongsereecharoen, E., Chanlek, N., et al. (2020). Influence of RF power and CH4 flow rate on properties of diamond-like carbon films deposited by PECVD technique. Radiation Physics and Chemistry, 176:109073.
Domingo, T., Starosta, K., Chester, A., et al. (2017). Studying levels of Fukushima-derived radioactivity in sock-eye salmon collected on the west coast of Vancouver Island. Radiation Physics and Chemistry, 140:186–189.
El-Khatib, A. M., Elsafi, M., Almutiri, M. N., et al. (2021). Enhancement of bentonite materials with cement for gamma-ray shielding capability. Materials, 14(16):4697.
Elsafi, M., Almuqrin, A. H., Yasmin, S., et al. (2023). The affinity of bentonite and WO3 nanoparticles toward epoxy resin polymer for radiation shielding. e-Polymers, 23(1):20230011.
Filgueiras, R. A., Silva, A. X., Ribeiro, F. C. A., et al. (2020). Baseline, mapping and dose estimation of natural radioactivity in soils of the Brazilian state of Alagoas. Radiation Physics and Chemistry, 167:108332.
Frondel, C. (1962). Dana’s system of mineralogy. Silica Minerals.
Hashim, S., Omar, R., and Ghoshal, S. (2019). Realization of dysprosium doped lithium magnesium borate glass based TLD subjected to 1–100 Gy photon beam irradiations. Radiation Physics and Chemistry, 163:1–10.
Hassan, M., Khatib, J., Mangat, P., et al. (2013). FTIR and XRD characterized lime stabilized lead contaminated soil. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Environmental, Chemistry and Biology, Singapore, pages 24–25.
Hubbell, J. and Seltzer, S. (1995). NIST (IR) Report No. 5632.
Jackson, D. F. and Hawkes, D. J. (1981). X-ray attenuation coefficients of elements and mixtures. Physics Reports, 70(3):169–233.
Jayakumar, S., Saravanan, T., and Philip, J. (2023). A review on polymer nanocomposites as lead-free materials for diagnostic X-ray shielding: Recent advances, challenges and future perspectives. Hybrid Advances, 4:100100.
Kennedy, R., Wyckoff, H., and Snyder, W. (1950). Concrete as a protective barrier for gamma rays from cobalt-60. J. Research Natl. Bur. Standards, 44.
Kim, S.-C. (2022). Preparation and performance evaluation of X-ray-shielding barium sulfate film for medical diagnosis using PET recycling and multi-carrier principles. Coatings, 12(7):973.
Kinsey, R., Dunford, C., Tuli, J., et al. (1996). The NUDAT/PCNUDAT program for nuclear data. Technical report, Brookhaven National Lab.(BNL), Upton, NY (United States).
Liu, Y.-R., Huang, C.-Y., Hsu, C.-H., et al. (2017). Dose estimation of eye lens for interventional procedures in diagnosis. Radiation Physics and Chemistry, 140:247–251.
Malekie, S., Hosseini, M. A., Abiz, A., et al. (2024). Radiation shielding characteristics of HDPE/tungsten oxide nanocomposites reinforced with graphene oxide and LDPE using Geant4, XCOM and experiment. Polyolefins Journal, 11(3).
Malekie, S., Kashian, S., Akhavan, A., et al. (2023). Preliminary study of a novel radiation shield for jaw in dental radiography using the high-density polyethylene/bismuth oxide nanocomposite. Radiation Physics and Chemistry, 205:110743.
Mehrara, R., Malekie, S., Kotahi, S. M. S., et al. (2021). Introducing a novel low energy gamma ray shield utilizing Polycarbonate Bismuth Oxide composite. Scientific Reports, 11(1):10614.
Saleh, H. M., Bondouk, I. I., Salama, E., et al. (2021). Consistency and shielding efficiency of cement-bitumen composite for use as gamma-radiation shielding material. Progress in Nuclear Energy, 137:103764.
Schwartz, L. H., SCHRACK, R., and HEATON, H. (1974). National Bureau of Standards.
Singh, P. and Kumar, R. (2019). Radiation physics and chemistry of polymeric materials. In Radiation Effects in Polymeric Materials, pages 35–68. Springer.
Swanson, H., Fuyat, R., and Ugrinic, G. (1953). National Bureau of Standards Circular 539. Vol. II, 23.
Swanson, H., Fuyat, R., and Ugrinic, G. (1954). National Bureau of Standards Circular 539. Vol. III, 24.
Valen¸ ca, J., Silveira, I., Silva, A., et al. (2017). Optically stimulated luminescence of borate glasses containing magnesia, quicklime, lithium and potassium carbonates. Radiation Physics and Chemistry, 140:83–86.
Wu, S., Bao, J., Gao, Y., et al. (2024). Review on flexible radiation-protective clothing materials. Journal of Materials Science, 59(19):8109–8133.
Yang, H. and Irudayaraj, J. (2003). Rapid detection of food-borne microorganisms on food surface using Fourier transform Raman spectroscopy. Journal of Molecular Structure, 646(1-3):35–43.
Yavuzkanat, N., S ¸enyi˘ git, M., and Kaplan, M. (2022). Investigation of the gamma-ray efficiency for various scintillation detector systems. Revista Mexicana de f´ ısica, 68(4).

Articles in Press, Accepted Manuscript
Available Online from 30 January 2026

  • Receive Date 09 October 2025
  • Revise Date 28 January 2026
  • Accept Date 29 January 2026