A peer-reviewed journal published by K. N. Toosi University of Technology

Effect of titanium dioxide addition on radiation shielding properties of pumice-iron sand composite mortar

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

Department of Physics, FMIPA, University of Mataram, Jl. Majapahit 62 Mataram, 83125, Indonesia

Abstract
This study investigated the effect of adding 4%-20% TiO2 to a pumice-iron sand composite mortar sample in the development of radiation shielding materials. It focuses on the effective atomic number, porosity, attenuation coefficient, protection efficiency, and spectral attenuation behavior based on XCOM and GEANT4 simulation via 108 monoenergetic gamma photons of 0.356 MeV, 0.511 MeV, 0.662 MeV, 0.835 MeV, 1.115 MeV, 1.173 MeV, 1.275 MeV, 1.333 MeV, and 1.461 MeV. The study results show that the TiO2 enhancement identified at increased titanium content in composite constituent elements caused an increase in the effective atomic number. The lowest porosity was observed at an 8% TiO2 addition, as indicated by the photopeak height in the energy spectrum of the absorbed energy. Adding TiO2 increases the average LAC over 0% TiO2 composite mortar samples by 1.1%, 2.3%, 3.8%, 5.1%, and 6.6% for 4%, 8%, 12%, 16%, and 20% TiO2 addition, respectively. The same trend of the increased LAC is also evident in the GEANT4 simulation, i.e., 1.5%, 2.6%, 5%, 5.8%, and 7.2%. An increase in TiO2 levels increases the RPE, while an increase in photon energy decreases the RPE. The trend is in line with the photon energy absorption in the composite sample. On the energy absorption spectrum of the composite, double escape peaks were identified at 0.258 MeV, 0.313 MeV, and 0.440 MeV for 1.275 MeV, 1.333 MeV, and 1.461 MeV energies, respectively. The energy absorption of the composite mortar was strongly dependent on the effective atomic number of the composites.

Highlights

  • The effectiveness of radiation absorption is observed on the Zeff and LAC parameters changes.
  • The addition of TiO2 increase the Zeff of pumice-iron sand composite mortar.
  • Monte Carlo GEANT4 simulation is useful to observe the change of gamma radiation absorption.
  • The addition of TiO2 correlates with the change in gamma energy absorption peak height.

Keywords


Copyright
RPE is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0).

Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no potential conflict of interest regarding the publication of this work‎.

Funding
‎The authors declare that no funds‎, ‎grants‎, ‎or other financial support were received during the preparation of this manuscript‎.

Abbas, M. I., El-Khatib, A. M., Elsafi, M., et al. (2023). Investigation of gamma-ray shielding properties of bismuth oxide nanoparticles with a bentonite–gypsum matrix. Materials, 16(5):2056.
Abdullah, M. A. H., Rashid, R. S. M., Amran, M., et al. (2022). Recent trends in advanced radiation shielding concrete for construction of facilities: materials and properties. Polymers, 14(14):2830.
AbuAlRoos, N. J., Amin, N. A. B., and Zainon, R. (2019). Conventional and new lead-free radiation shielding materials for radiation protection in nuclear medicine: A review. Radiation Physics and Chemistry, 165:108439.
Agar, O., Sayyed, M., Akman, F., et al. (2019). An extensive investigation on gamma ray shielding features of Pd/Ag-based alloys. Nuclear Engineering and Technology, 51(3):853–859.
Agostinelli, S., Allison, J., Amako, K. a., et al. (2003). Geant4a simulation toolkit. Nuclear instruments and methods in physics research section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, 506(3):250–303.
Alharshan, G. A., Aloraini, D. A., Elzaher, M. A., et al. (2020). A comparative study between nano-cadmium oxide and lead oxide reinforced in high density polyethylene as gamma rays shielding composites. Nuclear Technology and Radiation Protection, 35(1):42–49.
Alsaab, A. H. and Zeghib, S. (2023). Study of prepared lead-free polymer nanocomposites for x-and gamma-ray shielding in healthcare applications. Polymers, 15(9):2142.
Bendahane, K., Belkheir, M., Mokaddem, A., et al. (2023). Date and doum palm natural fibers as renewable resource for improving interface damage of cement composites materials. Beni-Suef University Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 12(1):37.
Cheewasukhanont, W., Limkitjaroenporn, P., Kothan, S., et al. (2020). The effect of particle size on radiation shielding properties for bismuth borosilicate glass. Radiation Physics and Chemistry, 172:108791.
Dahlan, K., Haryati, E., and Aninam, Y. (2018). The use of papuan iron sand and river sand for fine aggregate in mortar for nuclear radiation shield application. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, volume 997, page 012023. IOP Publishing.
Egbeyale, G. B. (2022). Experimental investigation of contaminated clay slabs for X-ray shielding. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, volume 993, page 012013. IOP Publishing.
El-Agawany, F., Mahmoud, K., Kavaz, E., et al. (2020). Evaluation of nuclear radiation shielding competence for ternary Ge–Sb–S chalcogenide glasses. Applied Physics A, 126(4):258.
El-Khatib, A. M., Shalaby, T. I., Antar, A., et al. (2022). Experimental study of polypropylene with additives of Bi2O3 nanoparticles as radiation-shielding materials. Polymers, 14(11):2253.
Ganat, T. A.-A. O. (2020). Fundamentals of reservoir rock properties. Springer.
Gouda, M. M., El-Khatib, A. M., Abbas, M. I., et al. (2023a). Gamma attenuation features of white cement mortars rein-forced by micro/nano Bi2O3 particles. Materials, 16(4):1580.
Gouda, M. M., Obeid, A., Awad, R., et al. (2023b). Gamma-ray attenuation parameters of HDPE filled with different nano-size and Bulk WO3. Applied Radiation and Isotopes, 197:110790.
Ka¸ cal, M., Akman, F., and Sayyed, M. (2019). Evaluation of gamma-ray and neutron attenuation properties of some polymers. Nuclear Engineering and Technology, 51(3):818–824.
Khan, F. M. and Gibbons, J. P. (2014). Khan’s the physics of radiation therapy. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Kim, S.-C. (2022). Comparison of shielding material dispersion characteristics and shielding efficiency for manufacturing medical X-ray shielding barriers. Materials, 15(17):6075.
Knoll, G. F. (2010). Radiation detection and measurement. John Wiley & Sons.
Landsberger, S. (2015). Measurement and Detection of Radiation. CRC Press.
Mirji, R. and Lobo, B. (2017). Computation of the mass attenuation coefficient of polymeric materials at specific gamma photon energies. Radiation Physics and Chemistry, 135:32–44.
Nagaraja, N., Manjunatha, H., Seenappa, L., et al. (2020). Radiation shielding properties of silicon polymers. Radiation Physics and Chemistry, 171:108723.
Obaid, S. S., Sayyed, M., Gaikwad, D., et al. (2018). Attenuation coefficients and exposure buildup factor of some rocks for gamma ray shielding applications. Radiation Physics and Chemistry, 148:86–94.
Obeid, A., Balaa, H. E., Samad, O. E., et al. (2021). Effects of different nano size and bulk WO3 enriched by HDPE composites on attenuation of the X-ray narrow spectrum. Nuclear Technology and Radiation Protection, 36(4):315–328.
Obeid, A., Roumie, M., Badawi, M. S., et al. (2022). Evaluation of the effect of different nano-size of WO3 on the structural and mechanical properties of HDPE. Journal of Inorganic and Organometallic Polymers and Materials, 32(4):1506–1519.
Oglat, A. A. and Shalbi, S. M. (2022). An alternative radiation shielding material based on barium-sulphate (BaSO4)-modified fly ash geopolymers. Gels, 8(4):227.
Osman, A. F., Balaa, H. E., Samad, O. E., et al. (2022). Effect of PbO incorporation with different particle size on X-ray attenuation of polystyrene. Nuclear Technology and Radiation Protection, 37(1):18–30.
Osman, A. F., El Balaa, H., El Samad, O., et al. (2023). Assessment of X-ray shielding properties of polystyrene incorporated with different nano-sizes of PbO. Radiation and Environmental Biophysics, 62(2):235–251.
Park, J., Suh, H., Woo, S. M., et al. (2019). Assessment of neutron shielding performance of nano-TiO2-incorporated cement paste by Monte Carlo simulation. Progress in Nuclear Energy, 117:103043.
Saxena, S. and Sharma, H. (2025). Prediction and assessment of optimal concrete compositions for overall radiation protection and reduced global warming potential. Scientific Reports, 15(1):5785.
Tapan, M., Yal¸ cın, Z.,˙I¸ celli, O., et al. (2014). Effect of physical, chemical and electro-kinetic properties of pumice samples on radiation shielding properties of pumice material. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 65:290–298.
Taylor, J. R. (2022). An introduction to error analysis: the study of uncertainties in physical measurements. MIT Press.
Wani, A., Ara, A., and Usmani, J. (2015). Lead toxicity: a review. Interdisciplinary toxicology.
Wirawan, R., Angraini, L., Qomariyah, N., et al. (2020). Gamma backscattering analysis of flaw types and orientation based on Monte Carlo GEANT4 simulations. Applied Radiation and Isotopes, 155:108924.
Wirawan, R., Qomariyah, N., Ardianto, T., et al. (2021). Analysis of the radiation parameters of pumice constituent compounds using XCOM. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, volume 1816, page 012116. IOP Publishing.
Wirawan, R., Qomariyah, N., Ardianto, T., et al. (2023). Radiation shielding potential analyze of iron sand-pumice composite based on GEANT4 simulations. In THE 1ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SCIENCE EDUCATION AND SCIENCES, volume 2619, page 050013. AIP Publishing LLC.
Wu, D., Liu, Z., Chen, Z., et al. (2025). Effect of Elevated Temperature on Mechanical Properties and Shielding Performance of Magnetite–Serpentine Radiation-Proof Concrete. Materials, 18(12):2686.
Yasmin, S., Barua, B. S., Khandaker, M. U., et al. (2018). Studies of ionizing radiation shielding effectiveness of silica-based commercial glasses used in bangladeshi dwellings. Results in Physics, 9:541–549.
Volume 7, Issue 1
Winter 2026
Pages 47-58

  • Receive Date 04 September 2025
  • Revise Date 07 November 2025
  • Accept Date 05 December 2025