Radiation Physics and Engineering
A peer-reviewed journal published by K. N. Toosi University of Technology

Comparison of conversion factor methods in spectrometric dosimetry systems based on NaI(Tl) scintillation detectors

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

Akbar Abdi Saray 1
Hossein Zaki Dizaji 2
Mortaza Taheri Balanoji 1

1 Physics Department, Faculty of Science, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran

2 Faculty of Science, Imam Hossein Comprehensive University, Tehran, Iran

https://doi.org/10.22034/rpe.2022.341568.1088
Abstract
To monitor personal safety in the fields of biomedical and health physics, it is necessary to be aware of radiation doses to protect the health and safety of persons. Radiation protection quantities such as air kerma, ambient dose equivalent, and exposure dose rate are obtained by the measured spectrum to determine energy-dependent conversion coefficients/factors. This study aims to obtain and compare an ambient dose equivalent to H∗(10) from the measured gamma-ray spectra by the NaI(Tl) scintillation detector using two various methods. The first method, which is based on the detector response function to find the conversion function, is called the G(E) method. The second method is subdividing the measured gamma-ray spectra into the multiple energy bins, and then obtaining the ambient dose equivalent by using conversion coefficient functions (ω(E)), which were determined by the conversion coefficients (ωi) of each energy bin for three energy intervals of ≤185 keV, 185 to 850 keV, and ≥850 keV. To calculate the detector response matrix and the conversion coefficients of each region of energy, the Monte Carlo simulation code was used for the quasi-mono energetic gamma radiation sources and the synthetic spectra. The results indicate that using the technique based on subdividing the measured spectrum into multiple energy bins helps to avoid the inverse detector response matrix dimension limitations that occur in the G(E) method and also have a lower error percentage in the dose quantity calculation. Consequently, NaI(Tl) scintillation detector has an excellent potential to replace the classical dose rate instruments, i.e. Geiger-Muller, for the early warning of environmental radiation monitoring.

Highlights

  • Dosimetry methods have been developed based on the analysis of detector output data.
  • Three different techniques are studied to obtain the conversion coefficients.
  • The subdivision of measured spectrum method is provided to modify and improve the evaluated conversion coefficients.
  • The dose quantity calculation error percentage reduces by utilizing the improved coefficients.

Keywords

Detection
Monte-Carlo simulation
Ambient dose
Spectro-Dosimeter method
Energy-dependent conversion coefficients
Attix, F. H. (2008b). Introduction to radiological physics and radiation dosimetry. John Wiley & Sons.
Briesmeister, J. F. (2000). MCNP-A General Monte Carlo N-Particle Transport Code, Version 4C. LA-13709-M.
Buzhan, P., Karakash, A., and Teverovskiy, Y. (2018). Silicon Photomultiplier and CsI (Tl) scintillator in application to portable H*(10) dosimeter. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, 912:245–247.
Camp, A. and Vargas, A. (2014). Ambient dose estimation H*(10) from LaBr3 (Ce) spectra. Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 160(4):264–268.
Casanovas, R., Prieto, E., and Salvadó, M. (2016). Calculation of the ambient dose equivalent H*(10) from gamma-ray spectra obtained with scintillation detectors. Applied Radiation and Isotopes, 118:154–159.
Dizaji, H. Z., Kakavand, T., and Davani, F. A. (2014). Spectrometry and dosimetry of fast neutrons using pin diode detectors. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, 741:84–87.
Grasty, R., Multala, J., and Lemmela, H. (1992). Monitoring man-made radiation using a 256 channel portable gamma-ray spectrometer. In 8. International congress of the International Radiation Protection Association (IRPA8).
Huang, P. (2018). Measurement of air kerma rate and ambient dose equivalent rate using the G(E) function with hemispherical CdZnTe detector. Nuclear Science and Techniques, 29(3):1–7.
ICRP (1996). ICRP Publication 74: Conversion coefficients for use in radiological protection against external radiation. International Commission on Radiological Protection, volume 23. Elsevier Health Sciences.
ICRU (2016). ICRU report 39, International Commission on Radiological Units, volume 21. International Commission on Radioation Units and Measurements.
Lowder, W., Beck, H., and Condon, W. (1964). Spectrometric determination of dose rate from natural and fall-out gamma radiation in the United States, 1962–1963. Nature, 10.
Madar, V. (2015). Direct formulation to Cholesky decomposition of a general nonsingular correlation matrix. Statistics & probability letters, 103:142–147.
Moriuchi, S. and Miyanaga, I. (1966). A spectrometric method for measurement of low-level gamma exposure dose. Health Physics, 12(4):541–551.
Park, K., Kim, J., Lim, K. T., et al. (2020). Improvement of a spectrum-to-dose conversion function for electronic personal dosimeters. Journal of Instrumentation, 15(02):C02018.
Rahman, M. and Cho, G. (2010). Unfolding low-energy gamma-ray spectrum obtained with NaI(Tl) in air using matrix inversion method. Journal of Scientific Research, 2(2):221–226.
Salgado, C. M., Brand˜ ao, L. E. B., Schirru, R., et al. (2012). Validation of a NaI(Tl) detector’s model developed with MCNP-X code. Progress in Nuclear Energy, 59:19–25.
Tsoulfanidis, N. and Landsberger, S. (2021). Measurement & detection of radiation. CRC press.
Tsuda, S. and Saito, K. (2017). Spectrum–dose conversion operator of NaI(Tl) and CsI(Tl) scintillation detectors for air dose rate measurement in contaminated environments. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 166:419–426.
Wang, Y., Zhou, R., and Yang, C. (2015). Verification of the method of average angular response for dose measurement on different detectors. Journal of Instrumentation, 10(07):T07001.
Radiation Physics and Engineering
Volume 3, Issue 4
Autumn 2022
Pages 35-41

  • Receive Date 09 May 2022
  • Revise Date 28 June 2022
  • Accept Date 05 July 2022

Home

Submit Manuscript

Reviewers

Contact Us