An international journal published by K. N. Toosi University of Technology

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

1 Nuclear Science and Technology Research Institute (NSTRI)‎, ‎Reactor and nuclear safety school‎, ‎Tehran‎, ‎Iran

2 Nuclear Science and Technology Research Institute (NSTRI)‎, ‎Accelerator and physics school‎, ‎Tehran 14399-51113‎, ‎Iran‎

Abstract

‎A second shutdown system (SSS) is designed for the Tehran Research Reactor (TRR) completely independent and diverse from the existing First Shutdown System (FSS)‎. ‎Given limitations‎, ‎specifications‎, ‎and requirements of the reactor‎, ‎the design of SSS is based on the injection of liquid neutron absorber‎. ‎The plan has the ability to satisfy the major criterion of required negative reactivity worth‎, ‎to transfer the reactor to subcritical state in needed time‎, ‎with necessary shutdown margin and for the required duration‎. ‎Design calculations are performed using the stochastic code MCNPX2.6.0‎, ‎deterministic code PARET and Pipe Flow Expert software‎. ‎The ORIGEN2 code and HotSpot health physics code are also used for simulation of environmental pollution release‎. ‎The SSS chambers cause a decrease of about 5% and 15% in total and thermal neutron flux‎, ‎respectively‎. ‎To demonstrate the SSS role in enhancing reactor safety‎, ‎the probable accident of core meltdown is investigated‎. ‎As a consequence of this accident‎, ‎the radioactive pollution in and out of reactor containment is released‎. ‎Without existing the SSS and in case of failure of FSS‎, ‎the residents within 58000 m2 of the reactor perimeter would receive about 1 mSv which is more than the annual limit of absorbed dose for the community‎.

Highlights

  • One independent and diverse shutdown system is designed for the Tehran Research Reactor.
  • Design of Second Shutdown System (SSS) is based on the injection of a liquid neutron absorber.
  • Design calculations are performed using the MCNPX code, PARET code and the Pipe Flow Expert software.
  • ORIGEN2 and HotSpot codes are also used for simulation of environmental pollution release.
  • After equipping the TRR with the SSS, it is forbidden from signi cant release around the reactor.

Keywords

AEOI (2009a). Logbook of Tehran Research Reactor No. 38. Atomic Energy Organization of Iran.

AEOI (2009b). Safety Analysis Report for Tehran Research Reactor. Atomic Energy Organization of Iran.

ARPANSA (2001). Regulatory Assessment Principles for Controlled Facilities. Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency, RB-STD-42-00 Rev 1.

Boffie, J., Odoi, H. C., Akaho, E. H. K., et al. (2012). Design of an additional safety rod for Ghana Research Reactor-1 using MCNP5 code. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 245:13–18.

Bond, D. S., Franklin, S. J., Chapman, N. J., et al. (2005). Development of a diverse secondary shutdown system for a low power research reactor. In Research reactor utilization, safety, decommissioning, fuel and waste management. Posters of an international conference.

B¨oning, K. and Blombach, J. (1995). Design and safety features of the planned compact core research reactor FRM-II. Technical report.

Boustani, E. and Khakshournia, S. (2017). Enhancing Tehran Research Reactor safety through a Second Shutdown System: A probabilistic safety assessment. Progress in Nuclear Energy, 100:380–388.

Boustani, E., Khakshournia, S., and Khalafi, H. (2016). A pragmatic approach towards designing a second shutdown system for Tehran research reactor. Nuclear Technology and Radiation Protection, 31(1):28–36.

Dalle, H. M., de Mattos, J. R. L., and Dias, M. S. (2013). Enriched gadolinium Burnable Poison for PWR Fuel–Monte Carlo Burnup Simulations of Reactivity. In Current Research in Nuclear Reactor Technology in Brazil and Worldwide. In-Tech.

Daxesoft-Ltd (2010). Pipe flow expert user guide. https://www.pipeflow.com/public/documents/ PipeFlowExpertUserGuide.pdf.

Homann, S. G. (2009). HOTSPOT health physics codes for the PC, Version 2.07, Users Guide. Technical report, Lawrence Livermore National Lab., CA (United States).

IAEA (1991). Research reactor core conversion guidebook, TEC-DOC 643. 2, Vienna.

IAEA (1999). Basic Safety Principles for Nuclear Power Plants. INSAG-12, 75-INSAG-3 Rev. 1.

IAEA (2008). Derivation of the Source Term and Analysis of the Radiological Consequences of Research Reactor. Safety report series No. 53.

IAEA (2009). Safey assessment of facilities and activities, General safety requirements. No. GSR part 4.

INVAP, M. (2006). 3.0. Neutronic, Thermal Hydraulic and Shielding Calculations on Personal Computers. Nuclear Engineering Division, INVAP, Bariloche.

Kim, S.-J. (2006). The OPAL (open pool Australian light water) reactor in Australia. Nuclear Engineering and Technology, 38(5):443–448.

Lintereur, A. T., Ely, J. H., Kouzes, R. T., Rogers, J. L., and Siciliano, E. R. (2012). Boron-10 lined proportional counter model validation. In Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (NSS/MIC), 2012 IEEE, pages 4290–4295. IEEE.

Ludwig, S. B. and Croff, A. G. (2002). ORIGEN2. 2–Isotope Generation and Depletion Code Matrix Exponential Method. Oak Ridge National Laboratory.

Vanmaercke, S., Van den Eynde, G., Tijskens, E., et al. (2012). Design of a complementary scram system for liquid metal cooled nuclear reactors. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 243:87–94.

Waters, L. S. et al. (2002). MCNPX users manual (Accesed in Apr 15, 2012). http://mcnpx.lanl.gov/opendocs/ versions/v230/MCNPX_2.3.0_Manual.pdf.